Saturday, 19 February 2011

NOTE TO THE GROUP

Please check my PLANNING page for the first draft of the script and some written up notes of what we were talking about of how to shoot the film.

Monday, 14 February 2011

PRELIMINARY TASK EVALUATION REPORT

QUALITY OF HOLDING A SHOT STEADY & SHOOTING MATERIAL APPROPRIATE TO THE TASK SET



The opening shots of the student knocking on the door, door opening and walking across the room all taken from a one hundred and eighty degree angle were all fairly stead. But the reverse shots over the shoulder were shaky – this could have been fixed by more careful, steady holding of the camera or the use of a tripod. The preliminary task was to have three main things in it; a shot of the door from the outside opening, a continuity shot of the door opening, the one hundred and eighty degree angle used as the person walks across the room and reverse shots of a conversation between at least two people.



The material shot was entirely suitable to the task set, as the student knocked on the door, was shot opening the door from both sides, walking across the room and sitting to have a talk with her teacher in detention.

QUALITY OF THE FRAMING SHOTS



The opening of the film has the student centre frame, putting her at the centre of the audience’s attention. In the second reverse shot where the teacher is speaking back to the student, the student’s shoulder has been cut out of the frame which defeats the purpose of it being an over the shoulder shot. More care should be taken next time to include the shoulder.

QUALITY OF EDITING SO THAT THE MEANING IS APPARENT TO THE VIEWER

Every effort was taken in editing to make the meaning of the storyline in the video clear to the watcher. A continuity shot was taken of the door being opened from both sides, as the student opened the door and then the door seen opening from within the classroom. This made it clear that she was opening and entering the classroom.





A tilting shot was taken of the student walking across the room slowly looking downhearted; the pacing showed that she had come unwillingly. Instead of focusing purely on one person which wouldn’t make any sense, reverse cuts were made from student to teacher and back again showing the person only as they spoke, but including the over the shoulder shots so it was clear that they were talking to each other and having a one on one conversation.

QUALITY OF USING SOUND WITH IMAGES AND EDITING APPROPRIATELY FOR THE TASK SET

No music was used to heighten the effect of it being a real-life situation and so make the everyday feel even more dramatic when the audience is only focusing on the conversation intensely, particularly on the student when she suddenly snaps at the teacher.
The actors were made sure to speak clearly, but the video could have been improved by reshooting and having them speak louder or increasing confidence in their lines by either having memorized it completely without the script or improvising. Another option was having the sound dubbed in, but this would have taken out the background noise of computer machines whirring and so the decision was made to leave it in.


QUALITY OF POSITIONING AND MOVEMENTS OF ACTORS




The student was positioned on the outside of the door, knocking and waiting for the teacher’s permission instead of moving straight in – this shows that she is secondary to the teacher and has little power especially in comparison to him. The teacher was positioned at his desk throughout – she is in his room, on his turf. Therefore you expect that she is going to have to play by his rules but she defies this expectation and plays up to being the troublemaking student that she is by her outburst: “You callin’ me a liar?!”

The students movements are slow, and she takes her time walking across and slumps a little in her seat – she is clearly very reluctant to be here, although she did come.
The teacher’s movements are careful, much more measured and you can see that he is trying to keep patient – her loudness emphasizes how reasonable he seems by keeping his voice lowered.


OTHER POINTS OF EVALUATION (E.G. EQUIPMENT)


We used a MiniDV camcorder with 8mm tap. The overall quality of our video was not very high definition, however this may not be completely down to the camcorder. It was the only one available for use, and part of it was down to the unsteady hand of my holding the camera as well as being new to editing videos which with more practice ways of fixing quality, sharpening, brightness and contrast could have been used.


The software iMovie was used as we are new to editing and using Mac computers, and we quickly got the hang of how to make cuts after practice – after mastering how to use iMovie, perhaps a better program like Final Cut Pro or Sony Vegas could be used as they have more filters, and more ways to customize the editing of the film.


QUALITY OF SELECTING MISE-EN-SCENE

The setting selected was appropriate as in the script it was written that a student was having a detention with her teacher. A classroom was used within a real school, and the sound apart from the conversation was quiet so as to be believable that the detention was taking place after school. Natural lighting was used, daylight from the windows brightening the room. Props were sheets of paper being shuffled on the teacher’s desk that he appeared to be marking, the desk itself, the chair opposite in which the student. The teacher also wore glasses to emphasize the air of intelligence and wisdom.

QUALITY OF SUMMARY



What Went Well: The match on cut action, reverse shots and one hundred and eighty degree angle was all done well. The continuity shot was done right and the timing was done well enough so it did feel as if we watched the student open the door in real life, it was a smooth transition from the door opening on one side to the door opening on the other. Props were used believably, with the classic of glasses used for the teacher who authentically shuffled around his papers that he was grading, the school ID around the student’s neck and the real life school setting of the classroom.

Future Improvements:

* Practice editing with iMovie and if capable try moving on to Final Cut Pro for a wider variety of transitions, filters and manipulation of sound elements.

* Borrow a tripod to ensure that the camera is not shaky and possibly lights to use with camera if needed to brighten the scenes

* Experiment more with music and see if an instrumental piece could be used to subtle effect.



QUALITY OF GROUP PLANNING, ORGANISATION, MEETING TARGETS AND GROUP DYNAMICS

Different tasks were assigned to different people, and everyone took responsibility for themselves in getting their jobs done although finishing touches were a group effort. We all checked our free periods and worked out times where we could all meet up, and used that time effectively. We all also managed to meet the targets of the preliminary task, of a continuity shot of the door opening and closing as well as well as the reverse shots with the teacher and student characters talking to one another. Everybody was very co-operative and worked well together, and were professional as they put in extra time of their own into helping get this task done e.g. spending lunch time and free periods filming and editing, not just in media class.

Monday, 7 February 2011

FILM CLASSIFICATION




The BBFC (British Board of Film Classification) is an independent organisation - it is not funded by government money, but by the fees it charges to those who submit video works and films for classifications. This includes films and TV programmes released onto DVD or Blu-ray, video games, or distributed online by downloading or streaming from the Internet. It will not classify any material that it believes to be in breach of any criminal laws. Some of the categories the BBFC use with their differing requirements have been listed below - only ratings which would be likely to apply to the short film that will be made for coursework and therefore relevant have been included.




The only difference between 12 and 12A films is that the former is meant for DVDs and the latter is intended only for the cinema; where guardians of children under 12 can use their own discretion whether their child is able to handle the film and can be taken in. But when released onto DVD, all 12A film are made 12.

Thriller Example: INCEPTION.




Discrimination: language or behaviour that is discriminatory cannot be endorsed by the film in any way, and any of it will most likely be unaccepted unless condemned.

Drugs: Any drug misuse should be infrequent, not glamorised or give instructional detail on how to be used.

Horror: A moderate amount of psychological and physical threat is allowed, as long as disturbing sequences are not sustained/frequent.

Imitable Behaviour: Dangerous behaviour (e.g. suicide, self harm, hanging) shouldn't be detailed so that it's easily copied, nor should it appear free of pain. Easy accessible weapons, such as kitchen knives, should not be glamorised either.

Language: Moderate language is allowed, but the use of strong language ('fuck') must be infrequent.

Nudity: is allowed but if in a sexual context must be discreet and brief.

Sex: Sexual activity is allowed but should only be discreet and brief if included. Sexual references should not go beyond the norm of what a young teenager is likely to hear and frequent crude references will be unlikely to be accepted.

Theme: Mature themes are accepted but should be treated in a manner suitable to teenagers.

Violence: should be moderate, should not focus on detail. No emphasis on injuries and blood although intermittent gory moments may be passed if the context justifies it. Sexual violence however may only be implied, discreet and if present must be strongly justified by the context.







Thriller Example: NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN




Discrimination: As a whole the film must not be seen to endorse discriminatory behaviour or language.

Drugs: Taking drugs may be shown but overall the film should not promote or encourage any drug use. Easily accessible and dangerous household substances being misused such as aerosols or solvents is likely to be unacceptable.

Horror: Strong menace and thread is allowed as long as it is not sexualised or sadistic.

Imitable Behaviour: Dangerous behavour like self harm should not dwell on details which may be easily copied. Weapons that are easily accessible should not be glamorised.

Language: Frequent use of strong language ('fuck') is allowed. The strongest terms ('cunt') are acceptable if the context justifies its use. Repeated or aggressive use of the strongest language will be unacceptable.

Nudity: is allowed in a non-sexual context but should be without strong detail. If in a non-sexual or educational manner, then there are no restraints on nudity.

Sex: Sexual activity can be portrayed but without strong detail. Strong verbal references to sexual behaviour can be given but the strongest references are unlikely to be accepted unless the context justifies it. If the work's primary purpose is stimulation and sexual arousal then it's unlikely to be accepted.

Theme: There are no prohibited themes, providing they are treated in a manner suitable for 15 year olds.

Violence: can be strong but should not dwell on injury or pain. The strongest images of gore are unlikely to be accepted, and strong sadistic or sexualised violence is also unlikely to be accepted. There may be detailed verbal references to sexual violence but any actual portrayal must be discreet and have strongly justified by the context.




Horror Example: ROSEMARY'S BABY


According to the Human Rights Act 1988 as well as public consultations the BBFC held with the public, there are few boundaries at rating 18 based on the principle that adults should be free to choose their own entertainment. However, there are some exceptions:

* The material should not pose a risk of harm to individuals or society. For example, detailed portrayals of violent or dangerous acts and illegal drug abuse that could harm public morals or health. This can include portrayals of sexualised or sexual violence that might endorse or eroticise sexual assault.

* The material should not be in breach of criminal law, or been created (in any way or small part) by commissioning a criminal offence.

* The material is unacceptable at rating 18 if there are more explicit images of sexual activity unjustified by context. These kinds of images would be appropriate at 'R18' and in sex works.

PRELIMINARY TASK